On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:03:38AM +0200, AlunFoto scripsit: > Could I bother you guys to take a look at this comparison: > http://www.alunfoto.no/temp/flashAnomaly/flashtest.html > > All shots obtained at a working distance of 2 meters, and with > constant ambient light. The 48mm series stands quite distinctly apart.
That it does! > Graydon and John (or others), if you still think this is rationally > explainable by other factors than a faulty flash, please let me know. Faulty camera? I have zero experience with dedicated flash units, but that looks generally a bit erratic, not just the part where the 48mm setting fries the subject with excessive photons. So either the flash has a problem at 48 (quench speed, just plain too much omph, etc.) or the camera is asking for more than it needs for some reason. Have you tried this with a different lens? Preferably a prime lens with a wide max aperture? -- Graydon -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
