2009/7/29 John Francis <[email protected]>: > But that's only Adobe. While I suppose Dave Coffin, say, might be > able to enter into such an agreement with Pentax, it's probably not > going to be worth the trouble - at the very least, it would involve > lawyers, non-disclosure agreements, etc. And there's no way that I > would be able to get the information from Pentax for my private use.
Well it's available from the website of both Exiftool and the exiv2 library. Reverse-engineered and based on user feedback I assume: http://owl.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/Pentax.html#LensType My point is that Pentax would probably gain as a small brand by publishing the code-to-description mappings themselves. It would vouch for a faster implementation in all software. Jostein -- http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/ http://alunfoto.blogspot.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
