On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 7:00 PM, J.C. O'Connell<[email protected]> wrote: > huh, pentax doesn't have a FF sensor. If they did > it would around $2K like Sony, no? > > How many much cheaper non-DA lenses would it take to make > up the extra $800 or so for the FF Penatx body > vs the APS body? > > Answer - not many at all. A few at most. > -- > J.C. O'Connell (mailto:[email protected])
The question is 'how many of these cheaper non-DA lenses exist' and the response is none. Nor do they exist in the three systems that offer both APS-C and FF bodies. Nor will they exist anytime soon. The reality is you're going to pay around double for FF lenses which do not restrict FF sensor performance with current sensors than you will for APS-C lenses which do not restrict current APS-C sensor performance, this applies to normal and wide zooms as well as wide primes (there are plenty of normal and longer primes and telephoto zooms which are up to both APS-C and FF sensors, but there's no money to be saved there either since the ones which can perform adequately on only one type of sensor are doing so on APS-C). -- M. Adam Maas http://www.mawz.ca Explorations of the City Around Us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
