On Oct 3, 2009, at 11:23 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Although I don't know what your specific exposure issue is, I have
never shot in other than RAW, so am fine with a bit of under
exposure. Much prefer to apply a slight +exposure nudge than deal
with dreaded blown highlights.
Jack
I shoot only RAW as well, but I don't like even a small amount of
underexposure. It generates noise, and it can be critical at ISO 800.
Paul
--- On Sat, 10/3/09, William Robb <[email protected]> wrote:
From: William Robb <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: DPR review of K-7
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
Date: Saturday, October 3, 2009, 6:40 PM
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: DPR review of K-7
Yeah, as much as I've given reasons for not getting a K-7,
I still
might. If the exposure control control was much
improved that could
make me happy for a while... and if I can sell a couple of
items on
e-bay, as Paul suggests, it could make it less of a hit.
Let's see... if I order it Monday with expedited shipping
so that it
arrives on Wednesday when she's gone for the day... it'll
be just like
getting the K20D. It looks like the *istD to her and
in her mind it
is. :-)
FWIW, the exposure accuracy of the K-7 does seem better
than the K10/K20, and the *istD (which I found to be really
bad).
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
directly above and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
