Heiko, Odd question. The real choice here is between the 50's, in my view, because the 35 is sufficiently different from them to warrant carrying it in addition to whichever 50 you choose. If you can only buy one lens at this time, and you like the 35 length, get that one. Then, later, add a 50 for the different focal length and for the gain in speed.
Doug At 3:20 PM +01001/14/02, Heiko Hamann wrote, or at least typed: >Dear List Members, > >I want to buy a new standard lens for my MZ-5N (so far I only on some >simple zooms). As the smallest apperture of my zooms is 4, I am looking >for a standard lens with a smaller apperture for available light >photography. > >There are three possible lenses: SMC FA 1,4/50, SMC FA 1,7/50 and SMC FA >2,0/35. Regarding the 50s I would prefer the 1,7/50, as I don't think >that the 1,4 is much better for me (but more expensive...). But I really >like the 35mm focal length and 2,0 seems to be a sufficient small >apperture. Unfortunately I couldn't find much information on this lens - >seems to be quite new. > >Can you give me some hints? Has anyone compared these lenses (I already >know Stan's great lens database, Photozone and Photodo)? I'm really >interested in your personal experiences and opinions. > >Regards, > >Heiko -- Douglas Forrest Brewer Ashwood Lake Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.alphoto.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
