I would say a 28mm f/1.8 or f/1.4, but I don't think a fast normal prime should be something one needs to dream of. So instead I will kindly request a 135mm f/1.8. They can go ahead and use the design from the SMC-A* days, that's fine. I would like it to have a Ltd styling, like the new 100mm macro, but if they're going to make it a DA* lens, then please upgrade it to SDM II.
Will I get this lens for Christmas? I've been a very good boy... :-) --M. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- http://www.EnticingTheLight.com -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 2009/12/10 John Celio <[email protected]>: > With all the rumblings about the new D-FA 100 WR not being a lens anyone > wanted, I've been wondering: > > What is your dream lens that does not yet exist in the current Pentax > lineup? > > Rules for this question: > - Realistic lenses only. No 5000mm 2.8 Macro WR Super-SR SDM APO > Aspherical ED Extra-Crispy Tilt-Shift Low-Calorie Triple-SMC lens with > 24 aperture blades, a cherry on top and a pack animal to carry it > around. > - Describe just one dream lens. No "I can't decide between an 8mm f/68 > pinhole and a 76.4mm f/1.2 macro." One lens only. > - Explain why Pentax really ought to make this lens. > > > This should be fun. :) > John > > -- > http://www.neovenator.com > http://www.cafepress.com/jacelio > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
