On 11/1/10, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed: >I haven't even fantasized about autofocus that works that well. I can >see that if I were to start photographing fast moving objects then >there is definitely something a lot better than Pentax.
To be perfectly honest, and some may see this as strange coming from me, I don't think this is what the 'Pentax shooter' is about. Rattling off at 8 fps is neither here nor there. Why not just record HD video on that camera at 30 or even 60 fps and look through hundreds of frames for that absolutely perfect snap? Sure professional sports photogs get paid by results and so we would all sell most if not all our souls to the devil for a good paycheck and that may well mean 8 fps gunning. Horses for courses. If you want to shoot amazing wildlife like that or capture perfect sports stills, Canon or Nikon would be a good choice for the technology. For most other aspects of non-professional (and even sometimes paid) photography, Pentax and Olympus et al would be a better choice - and as we all know, life is *all* about choices. I'm not in the market for a DSLR at the moment, but if I was i think i would buy a K7D today. I want something different. -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ---------- http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
