On 14/01/2010, William Robb <[email protected]> wrote: > I had thought that about the only thing the two sensors had in common was > that they are both 14.6mp. I'm sure i read somewhere that the K7 was a > redesign from the ground up. It wouldn't surprise me if the K-x sensor was > slightly lower resolution, since it is, in reality, a slightly lower > resolution sensor. > I find the high ISO abilities to be intriguing, and I think that would be a > good complement to the ability to lock onto a fast moving subject.
I'd love to see a wide exposure scene shot with the K20D and K7 so I could actually compare DR/shadows for myself, there's so much contradictory information. Following is a shot I made fooling about with my V125/2.5 (AF sucks) on the K-x the whilst with Christian, Andrew and Brian to give you an idea of the general performance of the K-x. It's hand-held at ISO500, from the RAW file, just limited sharpening in PS (big file ~5M) http://users.tpg.com.au/distudio/temp/IMGX00317.jpg Cheers, -- Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
