It looks like it'll take an act of congress to get one.

On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Steven Desjardins <[email protected]> wrote:
> I hadn't looked at this thread in a while.  Clearly the Pentax FF
> issue is far more complicated than I realized.
>
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 12:11 AM, P. J. Alling
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 2/27/2010 12:50 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
>>>
>>> From: "P. J. Alling"
>>>>
>>>> On 2/26/2010 9:54 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > From: "P. J. Alling"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> On 2/25/2010 8:30 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>> > I'm pretty sure they do already get to vote for President, so
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>> there > must be some way to count their "electoral" vote.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> For them it's a beauty contest vote.  It doesn't count they don't >>
>>>>>> >> have representation in congress so they don;t get an electoral vote.
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Apparently I misunderstood how it works.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Puerto Ricans are U.S. citizens, but residents of Puerto Rico, Guam >
>>>>> > and the U.S. Virgin Islands do not vote in the national elections > 
>>>>> > unless
>>>>> > they're registered to vote in one of the states or in DC, in > which 
>>>>> > case
>>>>> > they should be able to vote an absentee ballot for the > district in 
>>>>> > which
>>>>> > they're registered if they happen to be back in > Puerto Rico.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Persons born in Puerto Rico, Guam and the U.S. Virgin Islands are U.S.
>>>>> > > Citizens.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Persons born in the Northern Mariana Islands and American Samoa are >
>>>>> > U.S. Nationals, but are not U.S. Citizens. U.S. Nationals may reside > 
>>>>> > and
>>>>> > work in the United States. They don't have to have a green card or > 
>>>>> > work
>>>>> > permit. They are not prohibited by federal law from voting in > national
>>>>> > elections, but no state permits them to do so.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > U.S. Nationals may apply for citizenship under the same rules as >
>>>>> > resident aliens.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > DC doesn't get representation in Congress, but they do have 3 >
>>>>> > electors; the number they would be entitled to IF DC was a state.
>>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> I don't know where you got that last one from but I believe it's
>>>> incorrect.  DC has no electors, and cannot, the number of electors is
>>>> defined in the constitution as the number of senators plus the number of
>>>> congressmen, since DC has neither then DC has no electors.  For DC to be
>>>> granted electors without representation in Congress would require a
>>>> constitutional amendment, which is not likely to happen.
>>>
>>> Amendment 23 - Presidential Vote for District of Columbia
>>>
>>> 1. The District constituting the seat of Government of the United States
>>> shall appoint in such manner as the Congress may direct: A number of
>>> electors of President and Vice President equal to the whole number of
>>> Senators and Representatives in Congress to which the District would be
>>> entitled if it were a State, but in no event more than the least populous
>>> State; they shall be in addition to those appointed by the States, but they
>>> shall be considered, for the purposes of the election of President and Vice
>>> President, to be electors appointed by a State; and they shall meet in the
>>> District and perform such duties as provided by the twelfth article of
>>> amendment.
>>>
>>> 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate
>>> legislation.
>>>
>>> Ratified 29 Mar 1961
>>>
>> Aparently I was wrong, however I happen to think this amendment is also
>> wrong, it violates one of the rationals for having a federal district.
>>  Perhaps that's why I'd prefer to forget it.  Too bad amendments to the
>> constitution can't be declared unconstitutional.
>>
>> --
>> {\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0
>> Courier New;}}
>> \viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the
>> interface subtly weird.\par
>> }
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>> follow the directions.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Steve Desjardins
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to