Ooops. Sorry. Thought I had that set properly. Fixed now. On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Anthony Farr <farranth...@gmail.com> wrote: > "This page is private. > > Oops! You don't have permission to view this page." > > You need to set the containing abum's properties to public, if you > want us to share your pain. > > regards, Anthony > > "Of what use is lens and light > to those who lack in mind and sight" > (Anon) > > > > On 19 March 2010 14:04, Nick Wright <nickwright1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I have been fighting with bad scans for quite a while now. >> >> By bad I mean images that when viewed at 100% look as though shot with >> a cheap digicam. >> >> So today I took a roll of film to a "pro" lab in the big city and paid >> about three times as much as the discount stores charge to get some >> "good" scans from my roll of film. >> >> Imagine my disappointment when I get the CD in the machine and >> discover the same kind of cheap looking scan. >> >> Here's an example: >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/pedalingprose/4443788489/sizes/o/ >> >> Turns out the sharpening method I used exaggerated the effect, but I'm >> leaving it as such for the time being so everyone can see what I'm >> referring to. >> >> See especially in the dark areas? That's not grain, that's digital >> noise ... unless I am completely mistaken. >> >> And I'm really sick of it. Is there no one left that makes good scans >> from a roll of film? Help! >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. >
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
