G, This is why I am so upset. I went to a "pro" lab and had expensive "high quality" scans done. And I am just not happy with the quality.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Nick Wright <[email protected]> wrote: >> The bottom line is that I really truly prefer film. I prefer the look. >> I prefer the process. >> >> Thanks for the input. > > If you prefer the look and the process of working with film, I'd > recommend either buying a top-notch film scanner and learning to do > that yourself or incorporating in your process having professional > quality scans done by either a local pro service that you build a > relationship with or using ScanCafe.com on their quick turnaround, pro > service. > > I see nothing wrong with someone preferring film capture and wanting > to work with it digitally post-capture. For me, it's a slow, difficult > and expensive process ... I find it gets in my way ... but I also love > the look of film combined with the ease and quality of digital image > management and processing. > > If that's what you prefer to do, you simply have to find the way to do > it that satisfies your quality and workflow desires. Your expectations > of quality, cost and convenience should also be metered by the > limitations of the medium... both that of film itself and of the > scanning process ... of course. > -- > Godfrey > Â godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
