Hmmmmm. . . . Looks good to me. On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:21 AM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mar 23, 2010, at 11:18 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > >> I decided to try a semiformal test of shake problems in my K-x, both with >> and without shake reduction on. >> I started at 1/200 second and increased the shutter speed up to 0.8 >> seconds. >> >> ISO 200, FA 31, shot from about 30" >> With shake reduction off it was only steady down to about 1/13 second >> With shake reduction on it was steady down to about 0.3 seconds >> Two versions of each, one is the full shot, one is cropped in tight. > > D'oh! > forgot the links > Shake reduction on: > http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157623682727196/ > Shake reduction off: > http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157623558209377/ > >> >> -- >> Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > -- > Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. >
-- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
