Do you need high ISO performance? The K-7 is tops over ISO 800, but the K-7 is the model to go for if you don't need the best high ISO performance possible.
By the sound of it you're working on a tripod, so I'd almost assuredly go for the K-7 since the K-x lacks support for a wired remote and delivers less resolution. Both bodies offer DoF preview (and Live View, which is probably superior for tripod-based work) and the 2 second delay. -Adam On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Barry Rice <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey Folks, > > I’m upgrading from a K10. I do serious botanical photography for stock > illustrations. Other than the obvious difference in pixels, are there any > thoughts on the difference between the K7 vs the Kx? Really, I shoot > almost exclusively in Av, and other than using the DOF preview, the 2- > second delay (to minimize shutter shake) are the only features I consider > crucial. > > I’m planning on shelling out the extra cash for the K7, but if the word on > the street is that the model is a dud, I’d like to know about it! > > Barry > > Barry Rice, Ph.D. > Carnivorous Plant FAQ > sarracenia.com > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- M. Adam Maas http://www.mawz.ca Explorations of the City Around Us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
