Barry, I began shooting with a K7 (upgrading from a K10D) 2 days ago. I took this on my way to work this morning; the only processing has been conversion from DNG to JPG:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11104884&size=lg (K7, FA 24-90, ISO 200, f/4.5 @ 1/750) I =really= like the size, speed, silence, and IQ. ISO 3200 on the K7 is less noisy than ISO 1600 on the K10D. So far, the only thing I miss from the K10D is being able to set the AF button so that it centers the focus point. Rick --- On Mon, 6/7/10, Barry Rice <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Barry Rice <[email protected]> > Subject: K-7 or K-x > To: [email protected] > Date: Monday, June 7, 2010, 7:02 PM > > Hey Adam, > > What do you mean by "The K-7 is tops over ISO 800, but > the K-7 is the model to go for if you don't need the best > high ISO > performance possible"? > > Was that supposed to read "The K-x is tops over..."? > > In my work, I am fanatical about getting the sharpest image > I possibly > can, so I almost never shoot at anything other than the > native sensitivity > of the detector, i.e., ISO for the K10. > > Barry > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
