On Jul 12, 2010, at 9:42 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Jul 12, 2010, at 6:04, Brian Walters wrote:
http://charles.robinsontwins.org/photos/2010/vermilion/content/IMGP3237_large.html
Yeah, it's cropped a bit and sharpened a bit and was taken with a
$40
lens. Someday I'll get the 50-300 and will be happy.
It looks as if that bird means business!
Excellent under the circumstances. Would it be worth doing some more
cropping? Perhaps turn it into a horizontal crop and lose most of the
dead tree.
Brian -
Funny, that - I took it in a portrait orientation so it never
occurred to me to crop it otherwise.
Something like this?
http://charles.robinsontwins.org/photos/2010/IMGP3237.jpg
I do think it looks better.
-Charles
I prefer the original. The sense of height that the vertical execution
lends is part of the story for me. The tighter crop also emphasizes
the slight softness.
Paul
--
Charles Robinson - [email protected]
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robinsontwins.org
http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
