Based on your thoughts I would agree the K-x would be competing.  The K7 seems 
to be the better choice for you.
-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. 

drd1...@gmail.com wrote:

>The E-P1 will probably be my low light camera since it's the one I'll grab to 
>go walking around with.  For me its mostly a question of actually taking the 
>camera with me for events where photography is not the main purpose. The more 
>I think about it, the Kx and the E-P1 may be competing for the same job. 
>Shooting off the LCD is even better in low light.  This is what has me 
>thinking about the K7 as the "serious work" camera, like a motorcycle race. 
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bruce Dayton <bkday...@daytonphoto.com>
>Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
>Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:46:33 
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List<pdml@pdml.net>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net>
>Subject: Re: K7 or Kx
>
>Good question, with only opinions for answers.  First off you have to ask 
>yourself what the primary use of this camera will be.  Any professional use or 
>strictly amateur.  The K-x is extremely well speced and is a bargain.  It is 
>very small and light and handles well.  It is also tops when it comes to low 
>light work.
>
>The K7 is a pro build, solid workhorse that is really designed to be used and 
>abused.  Everything about it is excellent.  The one "weakness" is the sensor 
>isn't as good at low light a the K-x.
>
>So I see it as the K-x is your choice if low light work is a major issue or if 
>the camera will be used moderately.  The K7 is your choice if you are looking 
>for a real "go to" camera that is going to be used a lot.
>-- 
>Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. 
>
>"Steven Desjardins" <drd1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Geez, the Leica thread turned into an "everybody sucks" thread.
>>Here's a photographic opinion question for the combined wisdom of the
>>list.
>>
>>OK, so the last time I saved up money I ended up buying an E-P1 and a
>>Lumix 20mm 1.7.  Combined with the macro 50 it's my walk around Disney
>>World, etc., kit.  I just did a major culling of the Pentax gear and
>>only have the FA20-35, FA50 1.4 and the FA135 2.8 left.  I need a new
>>main body (I do have the *ist D and Ds left but not what I want to go
>>with).  The Kx and K7 should be coming down a bit in price because of
>>the Kr and K5.  I have about $900 but the Kr looks a lot like an
>>upgraded Kx with  the same sensor.  I can go with the Kx and get a
>>couple of kit lenses for about $100 extra (the 18-55 and the 55-300)
>>or just blow it all on the K7.  there are lots of advantages to the Kx
>>but the K7 might make a better compliment to the E-P1.  Also, this
>>body has to last a bit.  Since I'd like to start spending future funds
>>on lenses, especially since I'm now keeping two kits.  Thoughts?
>>
>>BTW, any opinions about how long I should wait for the "best to within
>>$100" Kx/K7 price?
>>-- 
>>Steve Desjardins
>>
>>-- 
>>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>PDML@pdml.net
>>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
>>the directions.
>>
>
>
>-- 
>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>PDML@pdml.net
>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
>the directions.
>-- 
>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>PDML@pdml.net
>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
>the directions.
>


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to