On Oct 12, 2010, at 2:34 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:

> You're going to get an earfull about the differences, however for about 
> $20-40 more you can get the SMCP 135mm f2.5,

I got about $200 for my SMCP 135/2.5 on ebay. Don't know if that was an 
aberration, but there were plenty of bidders.
Paul


> which is not to be confused in any way with the Takumar.  You can read a 
> review of the Pentax 135 f2.5 here 
> <http://www.photozone.de/pentax/143-pentax-smc-k-135mm-f25-review--lab-test-report>
>  
> 
> The only reason that the 135mm lenses are so inexpensive is that they fell 
> out of fashion about two decades ago, but prior to that they were probably 
> the second most manufactured lens.
> 
> If you want a faster telephoto, save your pennies and find a SMCP 135mm f2.5, 
> (or if you must have full aperture automation one of the A F or FA 2.8s).  
> Getting the M 135 f3.5 in the meantime for $45 is a good stop gap, you can 
> always sell it on ebay for about what you paid for it.
> 
> The Takumar would be a good portrait lens used wide open, but it's never been 
> called sharp wide open by anyone who used one of the other 135s, in fact a 
> lot of people haven't even called it sharp stopped down.
> 
> Note: I didn't even mention the SMC A* 135 f1.8, for two reasons, it's damned 
> expensive, and now that Pentax has a viable DSLR presence, I've seen none for 
> sale, it's become a "cold dead hands" thing*.
> 
> 
> *Not that it wasn't that before, just more so.
> 
> On 10/12/2010 12:40 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
>> Following a treat of breakfast at a wonderful little Ethiopian restaurant 
>> here, I stopped by Wings Camera, which sells mostly used stuff, a couple 
>> doors down. Went to the Pentax shelf to see what they had. First lens I 
>> picked up was a Takumar 135/2.5. Over the weekend a couple folks suggested 
>> the Pentax M 135/3.5 as a great, inexpensive option to consider for my trip 
>> to Northern Arizona.
>> 
>> They'll take $40 for the Takumar, but the Pentax is available from KEH, also 
>> right here in Atlanta, for $45 to $65. I'm wondering if anyone here's 
>> familiar with the Takumar and might have a sense of how it compares to the 
>> Pentax.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Eric Weir
>> Decatur, GA  USA
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> "His lack of education is more than compensated for by his keenly developed 
> moral bankruptcy."
>     -Woody Allen
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to