On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Jaume Lahuerta <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree with you and Godfrey in that m4/3 is what 4/3 should have been from > the > beginning.
It couldn't have been. The development of sufficient quality electronic viewfinders is only now coming to fruition. > But I think that we differ in the importance of IQ because of the limitation > of > a smaller sensor (since the size factor difference has vanished as it did in > the > DSLR side). I'm not sure I understand this statement. > Anyway, my main problem with all the also called EVIL (mirrorless) is that I > don't like to shoot with them !! > I have looked through a G10 viewfinder and I don't feel confortable... That's the wrong viewfinder to consider as current state of the art. The G10 is a cost-reduced version of the G2 and one of the big areas they economized on is the EVF: it's a low-rez, slow refresh rate EVF more similar to the production technology available in 2005-2006. Much cheaper than the EVFs built into the G1/GH1/G2/GH2 and optional EVF for the E-P2/E-PL1. Don't judge until you try them. And this is not the end of the game either. :-) -- Godfrey godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
