> I contend that we haven't moved on beyond megapixel wars and never will.
> 
> All things equal, and even sometimes not, more MP means better resolution,
> 

all things are not equal, and the idea that they might be supposes that the
different-sized sensors are all cut from the same wafer in much the same way
that film was, rather than being designed from scratch for the size that
they are. There are obviously going to be pros and cons of each format.

> Raw, unadulterated resolution (combined with noise attributes), is likely
the
> one single factor that will continue to improve in a quantifiable degree.
> 
> If two camera bodies cost approximately the same, and I was going to
> purchase one of them, I would always opt for the the one with the larger
> physical sensor/larger megapixel combination.
> 

Really? No other features matter? You're a very unusual camera buyer.

> I'd like to hear why 4/3 is BETTER than APS-C, not why it's NOT LESS.
> Quantifiably, why is it NOT LESS?

you seem to be contradicting yourself here. Still, it's going to depend on
what you mean by BETTER - if you want numbers you'll have to define your
terms. Nevertheless, who has said that 4/3rds is better? The formats have a
different history. APS-C was designed to fit into bodies that take existing
lenses so as to capitalize on people's existing investments. This involved
some fairly significant design compromises arising from the different
natures of film and digital surfaces. 4/3rds was designed from scratch as a
complete system. My own experience is that in practical, real world terms
the size of the sensors doesn't make any significant difference to the
outcome, namely a raw file. You pays your money and you takes your choice.

A far more important difference in my opinion, as someone who doesn't like
cropping, are the different dimensions of the sensors.

> 
> Those caps aren't shouting, they're just for a bit of emphasis.
> 
> Tom C.



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to