On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 05:34:53PM -0600, Bran Everseeking wrote: > On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:28:00 -0400 > John Sessoms <jsessoms...@nc.rr.com> wrote: > > > Why are they called THIRD party lenses? Shouldn't they be second > > party lenses, or if not, who is the second party? > > > I think we are the second party.
Yep. As Groucho would put it: The party of the second part (henceforth referred to as "the party of the second part") ... (and don't forget the sanity clause). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
