On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 08:47:24PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote: > > On Oct 27, 2010, at 4:48 PM, John Francis wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 05:34:53PM -0600, Bran Everseeking wrote: > >> On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:28:00 -0400 > >> John Sessoms <jsessoms...@nc.rr.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Why are they called THIRD party lenses? Shouldn't they be second > >>> party lenses, or if not, who is the second party? > >> > >> > >> I think we are the second party. > > > > Yep. > > > > As Groucho would put it: The party of the second part > > (henceforth referred to as "the party of the second part") ... > > > > (and don't forget the sanity clause). > > Thanks for the halloween costume idea. Now I just need to figure out where to > get a red cap with white fur trim and a copy of the DSM in the next two days.
I offered to get my brother (who lives in Texas) a really scary Halloween costume - a San Francisco Giants outfit ... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
