From: John Francis
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 05:34:53PM -0600, Bran Everseeking wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:28:00 -0400
> John Sessoms <jsessoms...@nc.rr.com> wrote:
>
> > Why are they called THIRD party lenses? Shouldn't they be second
> > party lenses, or if not, who is the second party?
>
>
> I think we are the second party.
Yep.
As Groucho would put it: The party of the second part
(henceforth referred to as "the party of the second part") ...
(and don't forget the sanity clause).
Ha ha ... you can't fool me. There ain't no Santy Claus!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
