From: eckinator
2010/10/29 John Sessoms <[email protected]>:
>
> Morally he should be reimbursed by *whom*? If someone is at fault in this, I
> can't see who it is?
>
> And if no one is at fault, then who exactly owes Walt for the damage to his
> car?
see, there's your difference between 'morally' and 'logically' - by
gut feeling, i.e. 'morally' it just isn't fair that Plymouth should
get away with building a car that catches fire, recall or not,
maintenance or not. Cars aren't supposed to be built that way, period.
'logically'... well first of all it is a cultural thing - what is
considered fair in one society may not be in another and then the rest
is probably a matter for experts, lawyers and judges to decide.
Personally, I do fail to understand how the maker of the part that
failed and caused the fire could NOT be at fault. How is that?
Thanks
Ecke
Parts wear out. Old cars die. The vehicle lasted at 7 years beyond the
warranty.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
