2010/10/29 John Sessoms <[email protected]>: > > Morally he should be reimbursed by *whom*? If someone is at fault in this, I > can't see who it is? > > And if no one is at fault, then who exactly owes Walt for the damage to his > car?
see, there's your difference between 'morally' and 'logically' - by gut feeling, i.e. 'morally' it just isn't fair that Plymouth should get away with building a car that catches fire, recall or not, maintenance or not. Cars aren't supposed to be built that way, period. 'logically'... well first of all it is a cultural thing - what is considered fair in one society may not be in another and then the rest is probably a matter for experts, lawyers and judges to decide. Personally, I do fail to understand how the maker of the part that failed and caused the fire could NOT be at fault. How is that? Thanks Ecke -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
