On Nov 10, 2010, at 6:45 AM, Jaume Lahuerta wrote:

> ----- Mensaje original ----
> 
>> De: Boris Liberman <[email protected]>
>> Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>> Enviado: miƩ,10 noviembre, 2010 09:26
>> Asunto: Re: K-5, K-7, side-by-side at ISO 6400
>> 
>> On 11/9/2010 6:24 PM, Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
>>> I understand your reasons  but what amazes me a bit is how a sensor praised 
>> for
>>> almost everybody is  bashed that hard in the following iteration...is just 
> by
>>> comparison with  the new generation sensors?
>> 
>> It amazes me too, Jaume, because K-7's sensor  has so many reasons to be 
>> dissatisfied with. In a manner of speaking, it should  have been "bashed" 
>> long 
>> ago. But we're bordering close on starting rather ugly  flame war, which I'd 
>> rather we did not.
>> 
>> If you wish, we can continue this  line of though off the list.
>> 
> 
> Flames? You and me? i don't see this happening...as much as I like 
> discussing, I 
> hate arguing...(and I d'n't think that you are too different in this)
> Beside, I am not trying to defend my K20D sensor at all...I am too skeptical 
> for 
> this...I am just trying to understand how the opinion on it changes so 
> dramatically in so little time.
> 
> And, for the responses I got from you all, I think that i pretty make up my 
> mind 
> already. I think that it is the combination of three factors, that lead to 
> this 
> result:
> 
> a) As you say, the K20D sensor probably wasn't as good after all.
> b) When moving to the K-7, the made it faster but they worsened a bit other 
> aspects like noise and DR
> c) The K-7 sensor is probably not that, that, that bad...;-) but competition 
> (and Pentax itself) has improved a lot precisely in its weaker areas, so it 
> seems much worse as a result.
> 
> So, the sum of the 3 factor have resulted in a 'perfect storm' for the K-7 
> sensor (and camera).
> 
> Does it make sense?
> 

I found K7 and k20 sensors very close in terms of noise. And because the K7 
exposes much more accurately, in use it was somewhat less likely to generate 
noise. 

Paul
> Regards,
> Jaume
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to