That's a relief. Thanks for the info.
By the way ... is b/w 35mm more forgiving than color when printing
enlargements, or are you still pretty much limited to around 8 x 10
before the grain starts to get obtrusive? And how much difference can I
expect out of professional grade over standard consumer grade films?
-- Walt
On 12/4/2010 8:52 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Walter Gilbert
Great. Looks like I'm staring down the barrel of another expense to
go along with my newly acquired pursuit of film photography: good
printer, ink, and paper.
Seems there ought to be a way to embed processing instructions in the
EXIF data to tell the machines not to engage in such foolishness.
Maybe not. It's only scanning the negatives that gives the automatic
processor fits.
If you're scanning your negatives at home, once you have a digital
image you like, the mini-labs print them pretty much as you submit it.
They don't automatically correct "mistakes" like the machine does for
negatives.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
