On 12/27/2010 11:53 PM, David Mann wrote:
I wondered if you meant that... less seismically active would mean
leaving the country entirely which is something we wouldn't be
terribly keen on doing.
Hmmm. Evidently I am very ignorant. Isn't there any area in New Zealand
that is more quiet?
Anyway, by the time I eliminate countries with seismic activity, poor
climate, poor politics, or dangerous critters there wouldn't be much
left!
Andorra or Vatican come to mind. May be Lichtenstein :-). Granted I like
small places (*) having lived in Moscow, USSR for 20 years :-).
We've been through the worst of it and a few small aftershocks aren't
likely to cause too much concern other than a little lost sleep.
Maybe we'll get another big one during my lifetime but now I have far
more confidence in our ability to withstand it.
Indeed, experience is most important. No argument here.
Just be sure to keep save, Dave.
Boris
(*) I'd rather live in a small town but reasonably close to a big city
so that I can have both peace and quiet and metropolitan fun at any
time. Pampered me.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
