Sun Dec 26 20:15:15 CST 2010 Charles Robinson wrote: > On Dec 25, 2010, at 23:46, Igor Roshchin wrote: > > > > > > > I also use my lens, and > > I had the same written for my lens that is less than 1 year old. > > I suspect it is their almost generic assesment, - so that they are > > protected against your claims that they left any of such things on the > > lens when they returned the lens back to you. > > > > That makes a lot of sense - I hadn't really thought of it that way. > > Kinda hope they clean it up, though. :-)
Did you send it for a repair or for a cleanup?! If it is the former, why should they do the latter? ;-) I hope they would at least repair mine (17-70/4).. as it's been on the part hold (the circuit board) for almost 6 weeks. I don't think I'll get it back within this decade, but I am hopeful for the next year... The most frustrating thing is that it is open-ended. They claim that Pentax USA cannot get information from the headquarters in Japan about an estimate for the parts to be shipped. If that's true, - Pentax USA is in big ... well, has a big problem. I wrote to Ned Bunnell via comment on his blog. The comment was not let to the blog, and Mr. Bunnell didn't bother to respond. I guess it is's too common for them, - too many users are frustrated about their lenses not being repaired, - especially since the recent SDM lenses are known to have problems. Good recent bodies, - but problems with the lenses (and the customer service), - Pentax just cannot do all at the same time... Igor -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
