Mark Roberts wrote:
> The "check rated" system is, IMHO, a total farce. Any advertiser who pays for > enough advertising gets rated and how they do business seems to be irrelevant. Agree. Many sleazy operators are check-rated, making that designation not really helpful. > BTW: I *did* exact revenge one one of these "check rated" con artists, although > I'll decline to mention how in public. But I'll say it was Cambridge Camera, > widely recognized as being the worst of the worst as far as business practices > are concerned. Cambridge was check-rated for years, too, and was a regular advertiser in Pop, although I think I read somewhere not too long ago that their ads finally were bounced because of complaints. (Haven't verified this myself -- I don't read Pop anymore.) Bob - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
