On Mar 13, 2011, at 9:06 PM, Phil Northeast wrote: > > Larry here are the next two, I started concentrating on noise performance > at this stage as it is important to me.
Thanks a bunch. > > If you have a look at the example photos with the articles ( the access > thumbnails are stuck a the bottom ) thay give an indication of how good the > K-5 is in low light. Speaking of which, tonight I bought a backdrop from a friend who was no longer using it. As boys are wont to do, we were comparing our various toys. At one point we did an informal side by side comparison of the high ISO ability of his 5DII, an my K-5. The K-5 seemed noticeably better. Mind you, the roles might be reversed at ISO 100 looking at a 36x48 print. -- Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
