On Mar 14, 2011, at 4:18 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:

> 
> On Mar 13, 2011, at 11:53 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I frequently use ISO 400 in good light with the K-5, just to get the 
>>> shutter speed. The noise is negligible. That wasn't true of the K20.
>> 
>> Clearly Paul and I see pictures differently :)  On the K20 I regularly
>> shoot at 1600 and even print some of those.  The noise issues have
>> gotten better with Lr3's vastly better antinoise, but I think the big
>> factor is that the noise actually just doesn't bother me much.  -Tim
> 
> I don't mind a bit of noise for some shots either. But the original poster 
> was asking about noise levels comparable to shooting in native mode of ISO 
> 100 or 200. For some of the work I do, such as shooting cars for magazine 
> publication, even a small amount of noticeable noise is unacceptable. With 
> the k-7 and K20, that meant never going beyond ISO 200. With the K05, ISO 400 
> is completely acceptable and 640 might be as well.

Thanks Paul, that is the exactly the answer that I was looking for to one of my 
questions.


--
Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to