On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 07:18:36PM -0700, Mark Cassino wrote: > ? > The Q looks like a huge step up from the compact camera I'm used to using and > not as bulky as the micro 4/3rds, which are not all that small. If the image > quality proves to be good, I'll probably go for one. I'm pretty tolerant > about > what good means - if it is on par with a scan of ISO 400 print film, I can > probably make a print from it that does what I want. i ISO 400 print film in a 6x7, or ISO 400 print film in an Auto 110?
I think a Micro 4/3 system is as small as I'd want to use seriously. The Q is just too small for mu to hold comfortably. And when an E-PL1 is selling for $400, it's hard to consider $800 for the Q -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
