Godfrey, I did it just to prove a point. You cannot tolerate anybody who holds and voices an opinion different from yours. And, like my kids, you insist on having the last word in any arguement. (Thankfully, they have outgrown this as they reached adulthood.) You don't use Pentax cameras any more. Why do you bother with this list? You're constantly flogging your pictures and latest camera choice. After a couple of years of this, it all gets a bit tedious. Regards, Bob S. :-)
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[email protected]> wrote: > I see you just intend to go on like this forever. Okay, you're now on > my "ignore the assholes and send their messages to the toilet where > they belong" list. Good bye and go stuff it, Bob S. I hope you feel > pride feel pride in starting a fight where none was warranted for any > sane reason. > > On Tuesday, June 28, 2011, Bob Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote: >> Ads before still photos. Ads before video clips. >> Sounds like the same issue to me. >> Regards, Bob S. >> >> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Then stop irritating men wit your bs. The thread I posted had nothing >>> to do with photo.net. All you are intent on dong is elevating your >>> bullshit to a higher level of nonsense. >>> >>> On Tuesday, June 28, 2011, Bob Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Godfrey, >>>> It sounds like you are mostly annoyed about censoring in the discussion >>>> forums. >>>> That's a part of Photo.net I never use. >>>> And no need for bad language here. >>>> I'm trying to keep this on a higher plane. >>>> Regards, Bob S. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> I don't care how much time it takes to dismiss the photo.net >>>>> advertisements. They are not why I think photo.net is a disgrace and a >>>>> pile of marketing jerks. It's the fact that you cannot look at a >>>>> photo, anywhere, on that site without a bunch of advertising in the >>>>> way, and the fact that they are censoring the discussion forums at >>>>> their whim that I find abhorrent. I told them to fuck off and delete >>>>> my account. Haven't gone back there since for anything ... it's a >>>>> waste of time to deal with losers like that. >>>>> >>>>> There's neither right or wrong in this. I never said I was right about >>>>> anything, i said I detest bullshit like that. What, you say your >>>>> opinion, that you will live with crappy interfaces and stupid >>>>> advertisements, is "right"? Bullshit on that. >>>>> >>>>> I'm not looking at still photographs when I go to youtube to look at a >>>>> video, particularly not a video of a photographic equipment show. The >>>>> pop up advertisements (which I don't see at all for whatever reason >>>>> anyway) aren't even in my way if they do pop up. >>>>> >>>>> So don't be such an annoying jerk, ok? You have to learn to live with >>>>> the fact that other people are annoyed by things that you are happy >>>>> with. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Bob Sullivan <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Godfrey, >>>>>> You've got to learn to let things go. >>>>>> You can't always be right, no matter what. >>>>>> I'm calling you out on the Utube ads because you were so inflexible on >>>>>> Photo.net ads. >>>>>> Generally it takes me a second or less to dismiss the Photo.net pop-up >>>>>> ad. >>>>>> Utube ads seem to be running for at least 3 seconds before they can be >>>>>> dismissed. >>>>>> Ads are a fact of life, learn to live with them in peace and harmony. >>>>>> Regards, Bob S. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Bob S is pestering me because I said that "I despise advertising when >>>>>>> I'm trying to look at photos" in the discussion about photo.wreck. >>>>>>> He's evidently a lover of advertising and photo.wreck. Well, number >>>>>>> one ... this isn't "looking at photos". It's looking at a youtube >>>>>>> video. So he's just being a PITA. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But more significantly, I don't see any advertising when I look at the >>>>>>> link I posted, in either FireFox or Safari. The screen capture shows >>>>>>> what I see. I don't have any adblockers installed either. So I'm very >>>>>>> curious as to what Bob is seeing, and why. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I know he's looking with a Windows system and I'm looking with a Mac >>>>>>> OS X system. What are you looking with? What browser? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> G >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 1:54 PM, L> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. >>> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> > > -- > Godfrey > godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
