Pot = Black

regards, Anthony

   "Of what use is lens and light
    to those who lack in mind and sight"
                                               (Anon)



On 30 June 2011 02:23, Bob Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Godfrey,
> I did it just to prove a point.
> You cannot tolerate anybody who holds and voices an opinion different
> from yours.
> And, like my kids, you insist on having the last word in any arguement.
> (Thankfully, they have outgrown this as they reached adulthood.)
> You don't use Pentax cameras any more.  Why do you bother with this list?
> You're constantly flogging your pictures and latest camera choice.
> After a couple of years of this, it all gets a bit tedious.
> Regards,  Bob S.  :-)
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I see you just intend to go on like this forever. Okay, you're now on
>> my "ignore the assholes and send their messages to the toilet where
>> they belong" list. Good bye and go stuff it, Bob S. I hope you feel
>> pride feel pride in starting a fight where none was warranted for any
>> sane reason.
>>
>> On Tuesday, June 28, 2011, Bob Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Ads before still photos.  Ads before video clips.
>>> Sounds like the same issue to me.
>>> Regards,  Bob S.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> Then stop irritating men wit your bs. The thread I posted had nothing
>>>> to do with photo.net. All you are intent on dong is elevating your
>>>> bullshit to a higher level of nonsense.
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, June 28, 2011, Bob Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> Godfrey,
>>>>> It sounds like you are mostly annoyed about censoring in the discussion 
>>>>> forums.
>>>>> That's a part of Photo.net I never use.
>>>>> And no need for bad language here.
>>>>> I'm trying to keep this on a higher plane.
>>>>> Regards,  Bob S.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[email protected]> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> I don't care how much time it takes to dismiss the photo.net
>>>>>> advertisements. They are not why I think photo.net is a disgrace and a
>>>>>> pile of marketing jerks. It's the fact that you cannot look at a
>>>>>> photo, anywhere, on that site without a bunch of advertising in the
>>>>>> way, and the fact that they are censoring the discussion forums at
>>>>>> their whim that I find abhorrent. I told them to fuck off and delete
>>>>>> my account. Haven't gone back there since for anything ... it's a
>>>>>> waste of time to deal with losers like that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's neither right or wrong in this. I never said I was right about
>>>>>> anything, i said I detest bullshit like that. What, you say your
>>>>>> opinion, that you will live with crappy interfaces and stupid
>>>>>> advertisements, is "right"? Bullshit on that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not looking at still photographs when I go to youtube to look at a
>>>>>> video, particularly not a video of a photographic equipment show. The
>>>>>> pop up advertisements (which I don't see at all for whatever reason
>>>>>> anyway) aren't even in my way if they do pop up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So don't be such an annoying jerk, ok? You have to learn to live with
>>>>>> the fact that other people are annoyed by things that you are happy
>>>>>> with.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Bob Sullivan <[email protected]> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Godfrey,
>>>>>>> You've got to learn to let things go.
>>>>>>> You can't always be right, no matter what.
>>>>>>> I'm calling you out on the Utube ads because you were so inflexible on
>>>>>>> Photo.net ads.
>>>>>>> Generally it takes me a second or less to dismiss the Photo.net pop-up 
>>>>>>> ad.
>>>>>>> Utube ads seem to be running for at least 3 seconds before they can be
>>>>>>> dismissed.
>>>>>>> Ads are a fact of life, learn to live with them in peace and harmony.
>>>>>>> Regards,  Bob S.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Bob S is pestering me because I said that "I despise advertising when
>>>>>>>> I'm trying to look at photos" in the discussion about photo.wreck.
>>>>>>>> He's evidently a lover of advertising and photo.wreck. Well, number
>>>>>>>> one ... this isn't "looking at photos". It's looking at a youtube
>>>>>>>> video. So he's just being a PITA.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But more significantly, I don't see any advertising when I look at the
>>>>>>>> link I posted, in either FireFox or Safari. The screen capture shows
>>>>>>>> what I see. I don't have any adblockers installed either. So I'm very
>>>>>>>> curious as to what Bob is seeing, and why.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I know he's looking with a Windows system and I'm looking with a Mac
>>>>>>>> OS X system. What are you looking with? What browser?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> G
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 1:54 PM, L> --
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>>> follow the directions.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Godfrey
>>  godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to