On Friday, September 23, 2011 5:17 PM, "Steve Sharpe" <d...@eastlink.ca> wrote: > At 4:00 PM -0400 9/23/11, P. J. Alling wrote: > >I can only compare the MZ-3 to the ZX5n which except for the higher > >top shutter speed on the former were pretty much identical. I > >noticed no difference in operation. AFAIK the only difference > >between the MZ/ZX5 and the 5n version was the addition of a DOF > >preview. > > The 5n had the panorama switch, too. Did the ZX5?
It did. Or at least my MZ5 does. Cheers Brian ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ > > > > >On 9/15/2011 10:54 AM, luiz felipe wrote: > >>Just found a MZ-3 offer at acceptable price, and I like the idea of > >>keeping a film body around for moments when risk of theft of the KR > >>is high - currently a job done by an EOS 500n. > >> > >>The MZ-3 looks the MZ-5 with DOF preview and a higher top shutter > >>and X sync speeds. I'm betting the overall feel and almost all of > >>the results will be pretty much the same, but since they came some > >>time apart, maybe they present some other diffs. Maybe faster AF, > >>or shorter shutter lag - I understand they have diff shutters. > >> > >>So, any hands-on experience on both cameras? Second to that, is > >>there any source of info on shutter lag for the MZ-3 and MZ-5? Any > >>comments on the MZ-3? Boz's site shows it to be slightly diff from > >>the MZ-5 in form of grip, so maybe it's significantly better than > >>the MZ-5 - I did have one MZ-5 for a time so I'm using it as > >>reference. > >> > >>TIA, > > -- -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Access your email from home and the web -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
