Thanks Steve, and all others who commented. That's probably what I'll do. For years, I scanned medium format on an Epson 3200 flatbed, and the results were good enough for magazine publication (which doesn't require that much in the way of definition), and they made nice prints up to 11 x 14. I figure the 600 or 700 will be that much better. On Oct 15, 2011, at 3:28 PM, steve harley wrote:
> on 2011-10-15 05:10 Paul Stenquist wrote >> In any case, the only film scanner that would be suitable would be one that >> accommodates medium format, and those are very expensive. > > if it were me, i'd get a good flatbed and when i found an image i thought a > better scan might improve, i'd have a service do it, and if i wound up doing > a lot of that then i'd look at buying a film scanner > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
