Please ignore that first post. I changed my mind, and rewrote it but somehow the first version got sent.
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Steve Desjardins <[email protected]> wrote: > The new limiteds (21,40,70) are very good but most are switching to zooms. > Increasingly, modern optics. Are as much electronic as optical with in > cameracorrectio. > ________________________________ > From: Collin Brendemuehl <[email protected]> > Sent: Sun Nov 20 06:17:44 EST 2011 > To: pdml <[email protected]> > Subject: Pentax today (was: Nikon User in Praise of Pentax ) > > It's not the history that bothers me. It's that it was all history. > > What is Pentax doing today that reaches the level of excellence that he > talks about with regard to those beautiful Tak lenses? There is a lot to > say which he did not know how to say. The essay requires an sequel. > > The question is, then: What does Pentax do today which equals or surpasses > the others? 50-135/2.8? K5? K-r/K-x? FA50/1.4, 31/1.8, 77/1.8? SDM? WR? > > Sincerely, > > Collin Brendemuehl > "He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose" > -- Jim Elliott > > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
