MPozzi wrote:> >No have not really considered the Sigma EX 17-35 >f2.8-4 >because I had seen some tests done with it and they >did not really shine compered to the ones mentioned >below. They were the users feedback from the photozone >site, and MTF tests done on one of the magazines.
Ah, glad to hear it! I didn't *want* to want this lens (mainly because of the filter size) so I'm pleased to learn it isn't very good. >Unluckily, I haven't seen any actual pictures taken by >that lens. >I have 2 sigma ex and very happy with those, but the >shortlis made below purposely left that sigma out in >favour of its newer constant wide angle, the value for >money and build quality of the Tokina and, well, >Pentax �cos its Pentax! Now if only Pentax would make a 17-35 (rectilinear) zoom... -- Mark Roberts www.robertstech.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
