On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Daniel J. Matyola
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree with Paul.  It is a wonderful image, but it might be voted
> down by some if they view it quickly without studying it.

Heh. From "Your Photo Gallery > Understand the Submission Process" ...

"2. Artists will approve or deny a photo, based upon technical
proficiency and artistic concept, including compositions, color,
subject & form"

2a. Or after viewing it quickly without study. Tough titties.

:-)


>
> Dan
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Bruce Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I'm not sure what we can learn from this, but last week I submitted my
>> shot that was exhibited at the curated Chicago Scharpenberg Gallery in
>> 2010, "PDML Augenblick". It was rejected by the PPG in 4 days.
>>
>> (It's this one: http://500px.com/photo/1422532 )
>>
>> I'm going to resubmit it just for grins, but I was rather taken aback
>> by that. Maybe it would help if I HDR'ed it first?
>>
>> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/bmw
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Daniel J. Matyola <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The Pentax Photo Gallery appears to be up to date.
>>>
>>> I spent some time last night voting on images, and the ran out of
>>> images to show me!
>>>
>>> I recently submitted some new images, and they were all rejected -- in
>>> two days!  I never expect everyone to like what I do, but neither did
>>> I anticipate such a bum's rush!
>>>
>>> Either the voters are getting pickier again, or Pentax is reviewing
>>> the images more closely than a month or so ago.
>>>
>>> Dan Matyola
>>> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola

-- 
-bmw

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to