On Thu, Dec 29, 2011, at 01:51 PM, Joseph McAllister wrote: > > On Dec 28, 2011, at 21:29 , Brian Walters wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011, at 09:55 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: > >> > >> > >> but I was rather taken aback > >>> by that. Maybe it would help if I HDR'ed it first? > >> > >> They don't want any out of camera fiddling, according to the rules. > > > > > > But there's actually a dedicated "HDR" category as well as an "In Camera > > Effects" category. There doesn't seem to be much point in having a > > separate HDR category unless they expect submissions to be manipulated > > in post. > > Most of the newer Pentax cameras, especially the P&S, have built in HDR, > in-camera effects, and more (frames on my Z-10). I'll wager that's what > Pentax is highlighting, to sell more cameras. Computer HDR-NO Camera > HDR-YES
Except that, the 'rule' referred to in a previous post says that anything done in-camera has to be loaded to the "In-camera Effects" gallery. So, why a separate HDR Category? Cheers Brian ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ -- -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Choose from over 50 domains or use your own -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
