Hmmm? That sounds like a great idea.
Let's have a gallery site to showcase the awesome work the photographers
who use our cameras are doing and fix the voting so the lowest common
denominator can block anything they don't understand.
From: Paul Stenquist
I like it, but I can see how a silhouette might be rejected without much
thought on the part of critiquers. Remember, many of the photographer judges
are shooters of minimal to modest experience. Anything that's a departure from
the norm is likely to fail in the peer judging. Paul On Dec 28, 2011, at 9:15
PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
I'm not sure what we can learn from this, but last week I submitted my
shot that was exhibited at the curated Chicago Scharpenberg Gallery in
2010, "PDML Augenblick". It was rejected by the PPG in 4 days.
(It's this one: http://500px.com/photo/1422532 )
I'm going to resubmit it just for grins, but I was rather taken aback
by that. Maybe it would help if I HDR'ed it first?
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/bmw
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Daniel J. Matyola <[email protected]> wrote:
The Pentax Photo Gallery appears to be up to date.
I spent some time last night voting on images, and the ran out of
images to show me!
I recently submitted some new images, and they were all rejected -- in
two days! I never expect everyone to like what I do, but neither did
I anticipate such a bum's rush!
Either the voters are getting pickier again, or Pentax is reviewing
the images more closely than a month or so ago.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
