On Wed, Dec 28, 2011, at 09:55 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: > > > but I was rather taken aback > > by that. Maybe it would help if I HDR'ed it first? > > They don't want any out of camera fiddling, according to the rules.
But there's actually a dedicated "HDR" category as well as an "In Camera Effects" category. There doesn't seem to be much point in having a separate HDR category unless they expect submissions to be manipulated in post. Cheers Brian ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ > > I'm not sure it was rejected on aesthetic grounds but on not showing > what the camera can do to best effect. I see little "halos" kinda, > around the edges of the horse and I bet that dropped it out. > > Or you just fell into a bunch of scenic only types judging at that > particular time. > > ann > > > > > http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/bmw > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Daniel J. Matyola<[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> The Pentax Photo Gallery appears to be up to date. > >> > >> I spent some time last night voting on images, and the ran out of > >> images to show me! > >> > >> I recently submitted some new images, and they were all rejected -- in > >> two days! I never expect everyone to like what I do, but neither did > >> I anticipate such a bum's rush! > >> > >> Either the voters are getting pickier again, or Pentax is reviewing > >> the images more closely than a month or so ago. > >> > >> Dan Matyola > >> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola > > > > > > -- > > -bmw > > > > -- -- -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Same, same, but different... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
