Which pretty much validates my original hesitation in bothering to submit to the PPG. Kinda reduces it to the level of Flickr.
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: > I like it, but I can see how a silhouette might be rejected without much > thought on the part of critiquers. Remember, many of the photographer judges > are shooters of minimal to modest experience. Anything that's a departure > from the norm is likely to fail in the peer judging. > Paul > On Dec 28, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: > >> I'm not sure what we can learn from this, but last week I submitted my >> shot that was exhibited at the curated Chicago Scharpenberg Gallery in >> 2010, "PDML Augenblick". It was rejected by the PPG in 4 days. >> >> (It's this one: http://500px.com/photo/1422532 ) >> >> I'm going to resubmit it just for grins, but I was rather taken aback >> by that. Maybe it would help if I HDR'ed it first? >> >> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/bmw >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Daniel J. Matyola <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> The Pentax Photo Gallery appears to be up to date. >>> >>> I spent some time last night voting on images, and the ran out of >>> images to show me! >>> >>> I recently submitted some new images, and they were all rejected -- in >>> two days! I never expect everyone to like what I do, but neither did >>> I anticipate such a bum's rush! >>> >>> Either the voters are getting pickier again, or Pentax is reviewing >>> the images more closely than a month or so ago. >>> >>> Dan Matyola >>> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
