Bob,
I've got to disagree.  I think most people don't know depth of field.
Most folks 'see' everything in-focus and never think about another option.
When you take a picture and part of it is blurry and part in-focus,
they can't imagine why.
The world is an Ansel Adams landscape...
Regards,  Bob S.

On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Bob W <[email protected]> wrote:
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
>> George Sinos
>>
>> Sorry if I've said this before.
>>
>> Something I've learned from my students is the typical viewpoint on
>> "how things work."
>>
>> For many people, the concept of focus is limited to the "whole
>> picture" being fuzzy or sharp.  Think of focusing a movie projector.
>> The image is either sharp or it isn't.  The idea of selective focus
>> isn't even in their mental model of the world.
>
> My experience is completely the opposite. Most people I've discussed this
> with are very aware of out of focus backgrounds, but don't know how to
> achieve them. When I had the Contax / Zeiss equipment on of the things that
> really drew people's attention was the quality of the out-of-focus
> bacground.
>
> On the other hand, they don't notice deep focus. For example, in discussing
> cinema they will be completely unaware of how Orson Welles, for example,
> used depth of field in Citizen Kane.
>
> B
>
>> Given that, teaching
>> someone how to focus or how to select between "spot focus" and "area
>> focus" is fairly meaningless.  The concept of controlling depth of
>> field us pretty tough without selective focus.
>>
>> At the first session, I ask people to watch a tv show or a movie and
>> watch how the director uses light and focus to draw the viewers
>> attention to or away from action on the screen.  The next session's
>> discussion almost always starts with someone saying that they had
>> never noticed any of that before.
>>
>> When you're describing things to the general public, I've found that
>> you have to start by describing the artistic effects that can be
>> achieved and WHY you might want to achieve them. Then describe how
>> those things can be done technically.
>>
>> Exposure, depth of field, etc.  All of these things are just means to
>> the end of making a picture and guiding the viewer's eye through that
>> picture.
>>
>> GS
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to