On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Mark Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > Paul Stenquist wrote: > >>True enough. But since the 60-250 is my most used lens, the fact that it will >>undoubtedly be awkward with that lens is reason enough to make it a >>non-starter for me. That's not to say it's a bad camera. It should prove to >>be a good choice for some folks. > > > All the bitching about this camera that we're seeing here, on DP > Review and Pentax Forums is irrelevant because this camera is aimed at > people who, by definition, aren't in these discussions. This doesn't > mean the camera will be a success, but it sure doesn't mean it'll be a > failure.
Interesting to note that in the school I teach, it gets more attention from the industrial design students than the photography majors. I think I would like this camera; not to replace my K-5 but to supplement it. Bong -- Bong Manayon http://bong.manayon.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
