Thanks, PJ, but I am not switching to Nikon at this point. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 5:37 PM, P. J. Alling <[email protected]> wrote: > No direct experience. However it's the equivalent of a 28-200 from the days > of film, has a /slightly/ better reputation, but still not great. I did a > little research for a friend who wanted a lens in that focal length range > for travel. I ended up recommending she get the Nikon 18-135 and a D90 to > mount it on. > > > On 3/14/2012 4:03 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: >> >> Does anyone have any experience with, or opinions on, the following lens? >> >> smc PENTAX-DA 1:3.5-5.6 18-135mm ED AL [IF] DC WR >> >> And just what do all those letters at the end mean? >> >> Dan >> >> Dan Matyola >> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola >> > > > -- > Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid > a lengthily search. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
