On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Tom C <[email protected]> wrote: >> If Pentax is making a mistake, it is in making the inexpensive line >> perform so well in the IQ department that the user feels no need to >> ever upgrade. I think enough people are happy with their 35mm f2.4, >> for example, that they don't feel the need to spend the extra for an >> f2.0, ever. > > Unless their lens mount wears out. ;-)
At US$249, it's $50 more than the FA50/1.4 cost just 3 years ago. Relatively speaking, with today's nincompoop-directed pricing scheme, it's a veritable bargain. -- Scott Loveless Camp Hill, PA USA http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/ __o _'\<,_ (*)/ (*) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
