From: Scott Loveless
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Tom C <[email protected]> wrote:
If Pentax is making a mistake, it is in making the inexpensive line
perform so well in the IQ department that the user feels no need to
ever upgrade. I think enough people are happy with their 35mm f2.4,
for example, that they don't feel the need to spend the extra for an
f2.0, ever.
Unless their lens mount wears out. ;-)
At US$249, it's $50 more than the FA50/1.4 cost just 3 years ago.
Relatively speaking, with today's nincompoop-directed pricing scheme,
it's a veritable bargain.
For about the same price you can get a FA50/1.7; $50 more you could get
the FA50/1.4
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
