That is probably true, because NG probably processes the film, but I don't think that the cost of processing is an overriding concern in a case like this. I think that the idea that the new Provia 400 probably wasn't out yet and the pushed new Provia 100 was better than the old Provia 400 that somebody mentioned is a likely reason. The photographer may also have felt it simplified his film supply problem by only using one film. Of course, he may have just run out of the 400 speed film too.
Ciao, Graywolf http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto ---------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 6:52 PM Subject: Re: National Geographic & Pentax question > Could it be that he can get push processing at no additional cost (over > conventional processing) while Provia F is significantly more expensive that > Provia F? - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
