Alban,

Personally, I prefer to work with people with whom I can discuss things
directly and without beating around the bush.
I was blessed to have a boss (who was also my mentor) like that for 
several years. It is especially important in my work - scientific research,
where you can "attack" (as in _challenge_) ideas without any personal
reflection. With that person we had episodes when we were yelling at
each other about the results we were discussing, but that had no
bearing on our relations.
At the same time I observed that many people are not ready to hear
honest critique directly. For that reason, some people thought of
my former boss as being too harsh and/or extravagant.

The idea of starting critique with the pointing out the positive parts 
is well known.  I've heard this in the management and teaching
recommendations. In the class on communication in science that I teach, 
I've been trying to suggest this to the students, and to implement that
myself. Yes, it does work for many people, but yes, it is hard to do 
it that way.

Igor


Wed Jul 4 11:33:03 EDT 2012
alban bernard wrote:

Trying to mitigate harshness by maintaining a constant 2:1 ratio between 
positive and negative feedback introduces a bias. Readers will accommodate to 
this bias overtime and after a certain period, they will know what a ratio of 
2:1 really means. Maybe, the time someone took to write a comment is already a 
positive thing in itself.

To me, it is better to rely on politeness and tact. Then, it is possible to say 
only negative things without hurting. 

Another interesting article to find somewhere is how to take and read critics 
from others in a positive way. In a critic exchange, there are two parties, the 
critic and the criticized one. Both have to make some effort to manage the 
negative effects of criticism.

--- On Wed, 7/4/12, Derby Chang <derbyc at iinet.net.au> wrote:

> From: Derby Chang <derbyc at iinet.net.au>
> Subject: Constructive Critique
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml at pdml.net>
> Date: Wednesday, July 4, 2012, 12:36 PM
> 
> Not a bad post from Eric
> 
> http://erickimphotography.com/blog/2012/07/how-to-give-a-constructive-critique-in-street-photography/
> 
> -- 
> derbyc at iinet.net.au
> http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to